Review



effect than ect  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress effect than ect
    Network geometry for the comparisons of <t>A</t> <t>Shoulder</t> Disability Index and B Shoulder Pain Score. TT, traditional training; <t>ECT,</t> eccentric strengthening training; CST, concentric strengthening training; SFT, scapula-focused training; MCE, motor control exercise; LLT, low-load training. The size of each node corresponds to the number of participants in that intervention arm. The width of the connecting lines represents the number of direct comparisons between intervention arms
    Effect Than Ect, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 9 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/effect than ect/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 9 article reviews
    effect than ect - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Effects of seven types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP): a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis"

    Article Title: Effects of seven types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP): a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

    Journal: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

    doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06514-4

    Network geometry for the comparisons of A Shoulder Disability Index and B Shoulder Pain Score. TT, traditional training; ECT, eccentric strengthening training; CST, concentric strengthening training; SFT, scapula-focused training; MCE, motor control exercise; LLT, low-load training. The size of each node corresponds to the number of participants in that intervention arm. The width of the connecting lines represents the number of direct comparisons between intervention arms
    Figure Legend Snippet: Network geometry for the comparisons of A Shoulder Disability Index and B Shoulder Pain Score. TT, traditional training; ECT, eccentric strengthening training; CST, concentric strengthening training; SFT, scapula-focused training; MCE, motor control exercise; LLT, low-load training. The size of each node corresponds to the number of participants in that intervention arm. The width of the connecting lines represents the number of direct comparisons between intervention arms

    Techniques Used: Control

    Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) for Exercise Interventions. A Shoulder disability index. B Shoulder pain score. Higher SUCRA values indicate a higher probability of being the most effective intervention. CST, Concentric Strengthening Training; ECT, Eccentric Strengthening Training; HLT, High-Load Training; LLT, Low-Load Training; MCE, Motor Control Exercise; SFT, Scapula-Focused Training; TT, Traditional Training
    Figure Legend Snippet: Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) for Exercise Interventions. A Shoulder disability index. B Shoulder pain score. Higher SUCRA values indicate a higher probability of being the most effective intervention. CST, Concentric Strengthening Training; ECT, Eccentric Strengthening Training; HLT, High-Load Training; LLT, Low-Load Training; MCE, Motor Control Exercise; SFT, Scapula-Focused Training; TT, Traditional Training

    Techniques Used: Control

    Funnel plots assessing potential publication bias for each outcome. A Shoulder Disability Index. B Shoulder Pain Score. Symmetrical distribution of the plotted comparisons suggests a low risk of publication bias. CST, Concentric Strengthening Training; ECT, Eccentric Strengthening Training; HLT, High-Load Training; LLT, Low-Load Training; MCE, Motor Control Exercise; SFT, Scapula-Focused Training; TT, Traditional Training
    Figure Legend Snippet: Funnel plots assessing potential publication bias for each outcome. A Shoulder Disability Index. B Shoulder Pain Score. Symmetrical distribution of the plotted comparisons suggests a low risk of publication bias. CST, Concentric Strengthening Training; ECT, Eccentric Strengthening Training; HLT, High-Load Training; LLT, Low-Load Training; MCE, Motor Control Exercise; SFT, Scapula-Focused Training; TT, Traditional Training

    Techniques Used: Control



    Similar Products

    93
    MedChemExpress effect than ect
    Network geometry for the comparisons of <t>A</t> <t>Shoulder</t> Disability Index and B Shoulder Pain Score. TT, traditional training; <t>ECT,</t> eccentric strengthening training; CST, concentric strengthening training; SFT, scapula-focused training; MCE, motor control exercise; LLT, low-load training. The size of each node corresponds to the number of participants in that intervention arm. The width of the connecting lines represents the number of direct comparisons between intervention arms
    Effect Than Ect, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/effect than ect/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    effect than ect - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Network geometry for the comparisons of A Shoulder Disability Index and B Shoulder Pain Score. TT, traditional training; ECT, eccentric strengthening training; CST, concentric strengthening training; SFT, scapula-focused training; MCE, motor control exercise; LLT, low-load training. The size of each node corresponds to the number of participants in that intervention arm. The width of the connecting lines represents the number of direct comparisons between intervention arms

    Journal: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

    Article Title: Effects of seven types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP): a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

    doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06514-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Network geometry for the comparisons of A Shoulder Disability Index and B Shoulder Pain Score. TT, traditional training; ECT, eccentric strengthening training; CST, concentric strengthening training; SFT, scapula-focused training; MCE, motor control exercise; LLT, low-load training. The size of each node corresponds to the number of participants in that intervention arm. The width of the connecting lines represents the number of direct comparisons between intervention arms

    Article Snippet: For the Shoulder Disability Index, CST showed a significantly greater effect than ECT (SMD = 3.49; 95%CrI [0.28, 6.7]), HLT (SMD = 23.87; 95%CrI [4.81, 42.92]), LLT (SMD = 22.90; 95%CrI [3.72, 42.1]), MCE (SMD = 12.04; 95%CrI [5.21, 18.88]), SFT (SMD = 12.65; 95%CrI [5.83, 19.4]), and TT (SMD = 5.91; 95%CrI [0.64, 11.17]), and the relative effect of ECT was greater than HLT (SMD = 20.38; 95%CrI [1.6, 39.14]), LLT (SMD = 19.40; 95%CrI [0.49, 38.35]), MCE (SMD = 8.55; 95%CrI [2.52, 14.55]) and SFT (SMD = 9.16; 95%CrI [3.19, 15.11]).

    Techniques: Control

    Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) for Exercise Interventions. A Shoulder disability index. B Shoulder pain score. Higher SUCRA values indicate a higher probability of being the most effective intervention. CST, Concentric Strengthening Training; ECT, Eccentric Strengthening Training; HLT, High-Load Training; LLT, Low-Load Training; MCE, Motor Control Exercise; SFT, Scapula-Focused Training; TT, Traditional Training

    Journal: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

    Article Title: Effects of seven types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP): a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

    doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06514-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) for Exercise Interventions. A Shoulder disability index. B Shoulder pain score. Higher SUCRA values indicate a higher probability of being the most effective intervention. CST, Concentric Strengthening Training; ECT, Eccentric Strengthening Training; HLT, High-Load Training; LLT, Low-Load Training; MCE, Motor Control Exercise; SFT, Scapula-Focused Training; TT, Traditional Training

    Article Snippet: For the Shoulder Disability Index, CST showed a significantly greater effect than ECT (SMD = 3.49; 95%CrI [0.28, 6.7]), HLT (SMD = 23.87; 95%CrI [4.81, 42.92]), LLT (SMD = 22.90; 95%CrI [3.72, 42.1]), MCE (SMD = 12.04; 95%CrI [5.21, 18.88]), SFT (SMD = 12.65; 95%CrI [5.83, 19.4]), and TT (SMD = 5.91; 95%CrI [0.64, 11.17]), and the relative effect of ECT was greater than HLT (SMD = 20.38; 95%CrI [1.6, 39.14]), LLT (SMD = 19.40; 95%CrI [0.49, 38.35]), MCE (SMD = 8.55; 95%CrI [2.52, 14.55]) and SFT (SMD = 9.16; 95%CrI [3.19, 15.11]).

    Techniques: Control

    Funnel plots assessing potential publication bias for each outcome. A Shoulder Disability Index. B Shoulder Pain Score. Symmetrical distribution of the plotted comparisons suggests a low risk of publication bias. CST, Concentric Strengthening Training; ECT, Eccentric Strengthening Training; HLT, High-Load Training; LLT, Low-Load Training; MCE, Motor Control Exercise; SFT, Scapula-Focused Training; TT, Traditional Training

    Journal: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

    Article Title: Effects of seven types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP): a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

    doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06514-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Funnel plots assessing potential publication bias for each outcome. A Shoulder Disability Index. B Shoulder Pain Score. Symmetrical distribution of the plotted comparisons suggests a low risk of publication bias. CST, Concentric Strengthening Training; ECT, Eccentric Strengthening Training; HLT, High-Load Training; LLT, Low-Load Training; MCE, Motor Control Exercise; SFT, Scapula-Focused Training; TT, Traditional Training

    Article Snippet: For the Shoulder Disability Index, CST showed a significantly greater effect than ECT (SMD = 3.49; 95%CrI [0.28, 6.7]), HLT (SMD = 23.87; 95%CrI [4.81, 42.92]), LLT (SMD = 22.90; 95%CrI [3.72, 42.1]), MCE (SMD = 12.04; 95%CrI [5.21, 18.88]), SFT (SMD = 12.65; 95%CrI [5.83, 19.4]), and TT (SMD = 5.91; 95%CrI [0.64, 11.17]), and the relative effect of ECT was greater than HLT (SMD = 20.38; 95%CrI [1.6, 39.14]), LLT (SMD = 19.40; 95%CrI [0.49, 38.35]), MCE (SMD = 8.55; 95%CrI [2.52, 14.55]) and SFT (SMD = 9.16; 95%CrI [3.19, 15.11]).

    Techniques: Control